I agree that the channels need to be well thought but i also think the community needs the best available platform for communication. I don't find the current solution inviting to new members at all. Web archive lacks a good search and replying to old threads is not possible trough web archive.
That is in the end what implementers will do. When the specs don't explicitly cover something they will search for information on how others have done the same thing and ask if required - this should be super easy and usable. -Pekka On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Pablo Pazos <[email protected]> wrote: > IMO we are over-engineering things that can be solved by agreeing on a set > of rules. We even have two lists technical and implements and there might > be just one. > > The active members of the community that participate in these channels is > low. Adding more communication channels will just disperse the community. > > We need less channels and usage rules. > > > > On Dec 30, 2016 6:18 AM, "Thomas Beale" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Following from what you and Bert have said, it seems that the following >> could make sense: >> >> - Foundation announcements list / channel (= openehr-announce list we >> have now) >> - software / libraries / tools announcements (= web home page news >> items with cog icon, also here >> <http://www.openehr.org/news_events/releases>) >> - this includes open source software libs / projects >> - commercial product offerings - currently we don't really have a >> way of doing this, but Industry Partners can post on web home page >> (factory >> icon) >> >> I'm not sure what the right approach is, since there are many technical >> possibilities. >> >> Marcus Baw has proposed moving to Discourse <http://www.discourse.org/> >> as a forum platform - maybe this is the kind of thing we should look at? >> >> - thomas >> >> On 29/12/2016 17:16, Diego Boscá wrote: >> >> Well, we will provide for free a product that was behind a paywall >> before (LinkEHR lite was the free version we had, and now the 'basic' >> and free version is the equivalent to the past LinkEHR editor). I'm >> curious what kind of announcement we could make :) >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_ >> lists.openehr.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr- > technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
