Thanks for the input everyone. My feeling is that Discourse is worth a small experiment but we will discuss at the Mgt Board meeting in a couple of weeks.
Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: [email protected] twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation [email protected] Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 2 January 2017 at 10:35, Pekka Pesola <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree that the channels need to be well thought but i also think the > community needs the best available platform for communication. I don't find > the current solution inviting to new members at all. Web archive lacks a > good search and replying to old threads is not possible trough web archive. > > That is in the end what implementers will do. When the specs don't > explicitly cover something they will search for information on how others > have done the same thing and ask if required - this should be super easy and > usable. > > -Pekka > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Pablo Pazos <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> IMO we are over-engineering things that can be solved by agreeing on a set >> of rules. We even have two lists technical and implements and there might be >> just one. >> >> The active members of the community that participate in these channels is >> low. Adding more communication channels will just disperse the community. >> >> We need less channels and usage rules. >> >> >> >> On Dec 30, 2016 6:18 AM, "Thomas Beale" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Following from what you and Bert have said, it seems that the following >>> could make sense: >>> >>> Foundation announcements list / channel (= openehr-announce list we have >>> now) >>> software / libraries / tools announcements (= web home page news items >>> with cog icon, also here) >>> >>> this includes open source software libs / projects >>> >>> commercial product offerings - currently we don't really have a way of >>> doing this, but Industry Partners can post on web home page (factory icon) >>> >>> I'm not sure what the right approach is, since there are many technical >>> possibilities. >>> >>> Marcus Baw has proposed moving to Discourse as a forum platform - maybe >>> this is the kind of thing we should look at? >>> >>> - thomas >>> >>> >>> On 29/12/2016 17:16, Diego Boscá wrote: >>> >>> Well, we will provide for free a product that was behind a paywall >>> before (LinkEHR lite was the free version we had, and now the 'basic' >>> and free version is the equivalent to the past LinkEHR editor). I'm >>> curious what kind of announcement we could make :) >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openEHR-technical mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
