Please, Ian, also discuss an announcementlist for free and open source
software (my favour is read-only, announcements only), and, also your own
suggestion, to have a low fee membership for single person or low income
business

Thanks
Bert

Op wo 4 jan. 2017 om 13:02 schreef Ian McNicoll <[email protected]>:

> Thanks for the input everyone. My feeling is that Discourse is worth a
> small experiment but we will discuss at the Mgt Board meeting in a
> couple of weeks.
>
> Ian
> Dr Ian McNicoll
> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 <+44%207752%20097859>
> office +44 (0)1536 414994 <+44%201536%20414994>
> skype: ianmcnicoll
> email: [email protected]
> twitter: @ianmcnicoll
>
>
> Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation [email protected]
> Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
> Director, HANDIHealth CIC
> Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
>
>
> On 2 January 2017 at 10:35, Pekka Pesola <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I agree that the channels need to be well thought but i also think the
> > community needs the best available platform for communication. I don't
> find
> > the current solution inviting to new members at all. Web archive lacks a
> > good search and replying to old threads is not possible trough web
> archive.
> >
> > That is in the end what implementers will do. When the specs don't
> > explicitly cover something they will search for information on how others
> > have done the same thing and ask if required - this should be super easy
> and
> > usable.
> >
> > -Pekka
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Pablo Pazos <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> IMO we are over-engineering things that can be solved by agreeing on a
> set
> >> of rules. We even have two lists technical and implements and there
> might be
> >> just one.
> >>
> >> The active members of the community that participate in these channels
> is
> >> low. Adding more communication channels will just disperse the
> community.
> >>
> >> We need less channels and usage rules.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 30, 2016 6:18 AM, "Thomas Beale" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Following from what you and Bert have said, it seems that the following
> >>> could make sense:
> >>>
> >>> Foundation announcements list / channel (= openehr-announce list we
> have
> >>> now)
> >>> software / libraries / tools announcements (= web home page news items
> >>> with cog icon, also here)
> >>>
> >>> this includes open source software libs / projects
> >>>
> >>> commercial product offerings - currently we don't really have a way of
> >>> doing this, but Industry Partners can post on web home page (factory
> icon)
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure what the right approach is, since there are many technical
> >>> possibilities.
> >>>
> >>> Marcus Baw has proposed moving to Discourse as a forum platform - maybe
> >>> this is the kind of thing we should look at?
> >>>
> >>> - thomas
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 29/12/2016 17:16, Diego Boscá wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Well, we will provide for free a product that was behind a paywall
> >>> before (LinkEHR lite was the free version we had, and now the 'basic'
> >>> and free version is the equivalent to the past LinkEHR editor). I'm
> >>> curious what kind of announcement we could make :)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> openEHR-technical mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>>
> >>>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> openEHR-technical mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openEHR-technical mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to