That is okay, Gerard, no need to be very sorry. It is just a discussion.
Exchanging opinions.

What do you think about the passages I mentioned in the same document on
page 12 and 13

Op 16 nov. 2017 00:59 schreef "GF" <[email protected]>:

> Bert,
>
> I’m very sorry.
> What I wrote I found it at their summary (page 8) of the NICTIZ document.
> Of course it is my selection from that text.
>
> Gerard Freriks
> +31 620347088 <+31%206%2020347088>
> [email protected]
>
> On 16 Nov 2017, at 00:53, Bert Verhees <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Gerard, Nictiz published hundreds of pages about blockchain. So if it
> is a hype (which it is), then Nictiz is playing an important role in that.
>
> You cannot summarize those hundreds of pages to a few words and then state
> that that reflects the opinion of Nictiz. Blockchain is a comprehensive
> subject.
>
> Please read this document, which is an nuanced inventory of their
> positions regarding this:
> https://www.nictiz.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/Whitepapers/
> Blockchain_in_de_zorg.pdf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-
> technical_lists.openehr.org
>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to