Bert, I just found this image on Twitter and it made me remember this trend where you tried to argue in favor of the blockchain in front of naysayers. https://twitter.com/MalwareTechBlog/status/932649133256597505 https://twitter.com/MalwareTechBlog/stathttps://twitter.com/MalwareTechBlog/status/932649133256597505us/932649133256597505
https://twitter.com/MalwareTechBlog/status/932649133256597505 Besides, it doesn't confuse anything. It plainly states "if you don't build a crypto-currency, then don't use a blockchain, and if you do, then please stop". Summed up, it means something as "never use a blockchain", but it is simply a humorous picture. Best, Philippe Le 22/11/2017 à 17:37, Bert Verhees a écrit : > Phillippe, in the image on your blog, you make the same mistake as > many make. You confuse crypto-currency with blockchain. > It is the same as confusing asphalt with a parking spot before the > bank. An asphalted road, however can lead you somewhere (if you have > a car or a bike, of course). > > Blockchain, in a special way, facilitates crypto-currency, but there > are more ways of blockchain, and completely other things which can be > facilitated by it. > > Best regards, > Bert > > > On 22-11-17 15:49, Philippe Ameline wrote: >> >> I was just trying to add some level of humor; sorry if it appeared >> ironic. >> >> However, if you are asking me what mistake major players and >> governments make, I have an easy answer: they all consider addressing >> continuity of care through a "record of records" when the only >> reasonable way (IMHO) is to enable multidisciplinary group work in >> the patient's "bio-psycho-social bubble". >> >> It is a very painful process to see, years after years, the same >> wrong idea being expensively tested again and again with more and >> more powerful (and/or exotic) techniques. >> As goes a French saying from the ancient TV comics "Les Shadoks": >> "They pumped and pumped and nothing happened... but they kept on >> pumping for fear that something worse could happen". >> >> Best, >> >> Philippe >> >> PS: I can provide (for free) a demonstration (with reasonably simple >> concepts from knowledge management) of the reason why a "record of >> record" is a wrong idea. >> But I know it is useless since, in France, our technocrats have been >> trying to do it with the "DMP" for 13 years... and going... since, >> these days, there is a new attempt... and they are very optimistic >> since, after carefully listening to the MDs, they built a user >> interface with less clicks. >> >> >> Le 22/11/2017 à 12:01, Bert Verhees a écrit : >>> >>> How do you explain that mayor players in government and >>> healthcare-ict industry do not agree with this? >>> >>> Which mistake do they make? >>> >>> >>> Op wo 22 nov. 2017 11:38 schreef Philippe Ameline >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: >>> >>> Hi to all, >>> >>> Just discovered a decision tree about using Blockchain that >>> pretty well >>> sums up our discussion: >>> http://philippe.ameline.free.fr/wordpress/?p=1979 >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Philippe >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openEHR-technical mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openEHR-technical mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
