Again my thoughts Duration is not a Data Type in many computer languages. So we need to model it in an Archetype (Chairos)
Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl Kattensingel 20 2801 CA Gouda the Netherlands > On 19 Mar 2018, at 06:24, Pablo Pazos <pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Looking at CDuration > http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/am/aom.pdf > <http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/am/aom.pdf> page 46, the > range constraint is defined with a Duration class. > > On the support specs > http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/rm/support_im.pdf > <http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/rm/support_im.pdf> page > 30 we have the ISO8601_DURATION class. > > Should AOM reference that class or we have another Duration class somewhere? > > Or should we use DV_DURATION in CDuration? (DV_DURATION inherits from > ISO8601_DURATION). > http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/rm/data_types_im.pdf > <http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/rm/data_types_im.pdf> > page 54 >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
