Hello Georg, What (and how many) objects you have inside the items attribute? Think the cardinality as the "vector" capacity, and inside you can put them in order (depending on their occurrences, they may even not appear at all)
Regards El jue., 29 nov. 2018 10:31, Georg Fette <[email protected]> escribió: > Hello, > I have an archetype with a complex object derived of CLUSTER with > "items cardinality matches {2..*; ordered}" > and those two items are also defined inside the complex object. > I understand the semantics of this definition that both items always > have to appear together inside the cluster but the package of those two > items may appear any number of times. > Is it allowed for instances of this archetype to have an uneven number > of items > 2 inside this cluster, because that would still suffice the > restriction of having 2..* children. Or do the instances always have to > have both elements as a package that are defined as items in this cluster. > As I am not the author of the archetype I do not completely understand > how the definition has to be interpreted. > Greetings > Georg > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dipl.-Inf. Georg Fette Raum: B001 > Universität Würzburg Tel.: +49-(0)931-31-85516 > Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732 > 97074 Würzburg mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
