------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Diego,
The items inside the CLUSTER look like this:
CLUSTER[at0001] matches {
items cardinality matches {2..*; ordered} matches {
ELEMENT[at0002] matches {
value matches {
DV_COUNT matches {*}
}
}
ELEMENT[at0003] matches {
value matches {
DV_TEXT matches {*}
}
}
}
}
It could be that I not yet fully understand ADL, therefore I would need to
verify/falsify some assumptions I make:
- Both elements (at0002, at0003) have an implicit cardinality of "1..1" ?
- The keyword "ordered" just indicates that the items inside an instance of the
cluster at0001 have to maintain the order in which they were defined. The order does not
affect an enforced order of the types of the elements inside the cluster ?
- What is true?:
* The cluster at0001 may include the elements at0002 and at0003 in any order an
unlimited amounts of them as long as the cluster includes at least 2 of them. The
specification inside of at0001 just gives the set of possible elements that may appear as
items of at0001. E.g. "at0003, at0003, at0002, at0003, ..."
* The cluster at0001 has to include at least 2 elements in the order given in the
at0001 definition and the order may be repeat an unlimited amount of times, e.g.
"at0002, at0003, at0002, at0003, ..."
Greetings
Georg
Hello Georg,
What (and how many) objects you have inside the items attribute?
Think the cardinality as the "vector" capacity, and inside you can put them
in order (depending on their occurrences, they may even not appear at all)
Regards
El jue., 29 nov. 2018 10:31, Georg Fette <georg.fette at uni-wuerzburg.de
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org>>
>escribió:
Am 29.11.2018 um 10:30 schrieb Georg Fette:
Hello,
I have an archetype with a complex object derived of CLUSTER with
"items cardinality matches {2..*; ordered}"
and those two items are also defined inside the complex object.
I understand the semantics of this definition that both items always
have to appear together inside the cluster but the package of those
two items may appear any number of times.
Is it allowed for instances of this archetype to have an uneven number
of items > 2 inside this cluster, because that would still suffice the
restriction of having 2..* children. Or do the instances always have
to have both elements as a package that are defined as items in this
cluster.
As I am not the author of the archetype I do not completely understand
how the definition has to be interpreted.
Greetings
Georg
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Inf. Georg Fette Raum: B001
Universität Würzburg Tel.: +49-(0)931-31-85516
Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732
97074 Würzburg mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
