On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 7, 2006, at 7:31 PM, David Blevins wrote:
To make sure we're all thinking alike, here are the releases that
I see coming up in the very-near future:
2.2-m1 (corresponds to Geronimo 1.2 beta)
2.3-m1 (corresponds to Geronimo 2.0 M1)
We don't/can't certify so there is no need to put the "milestone"
or beta prefix on the releases. If we're lucky we could do:
2.2 (Geronimo 1.2 beta1)
2.3 (Geronimo 1.2 final and Geronimo 2.0 M1) <-- this is the part
where we could be lucky
There is no code difference between 2.2 and 2.3, the only
difference is the version of the geronimo dependencies listed in
the poms which Geronimo should be able to exclude when it
references OpenEJB in configs/assembly. I think that kind of
hints at some of the items you were talking about.
Thoughts from anyone?
So, if TCK testing turns up any problems with 2.2, we'd spin a
2.2.1. Correct? If we get lucky, then no respin is required...
Sort of. Was more thinking that both 1.2 final and 2.0 m1 could use
2.3 if we were lucky.
-David
