Hi All... I think that this subject has taken a lot of discussion, as long as we are all represent one team and no one has a higher voice than the other whether he\she is a committer, not committer , PMC or not PMC member - which is the same thing David said some where in this loooooooooong thread - . What I really care about is not all these things, what I really care about is the team, all people who contribute to this community regardless their *role definition* are members of this great team, I hope we don't loose our spirit for some *boo boo* - I like this name :D - and don't loose the effort we all have done and concentrate on the effort we all have to do to make this team better and better to be the best among all other teams. I know that this is not a so official statement regarding the procedures and so, but I felt that I like to deliver it to the list and to the team which I am so proud to be a member of.
On 4/5/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote: > Da Wow..you sound just like my 9 month old calling for me! ;-) > > On Apr 4, 2007, at 9:17 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Thanks for openly discussing this matter and bringing it to consensus. >> This is a healthy community indeed. >> >> Let me sanity check that I've caught everything correctly: >> - the ppmc should have been sending out announcements of appointments >> as they were made. Lesson learned. >> - the group as a whole would like to proceed with graduation now based >> on the original proposal (pending a successful vote first, of course) >> - the pmc should make reviewing potential new pmc members a priority >> after graduation is complete >> >> Cheers, >> Brett >>
-- Thanks - Mohammad Nour
