Hi Bill, The goal of the project are users who are contended while using OpenEJB... Users' suggestions are the main foundation of OpenEJB development. So, if OpenEJB should be improved in some area in order to meet someone's requirements - that's likely it's going to be done soon if it's not yet being done.
As to EJB 2.0, OpenEJB is built upon Castor and I always though most of the EJB 2.0 features are already there. I hope I wasn't mistaken :-) What do you think is missing pertaining to OpenEJB and EJB 2.0 that you want to use ? -Jacek Bill Garrett wrote: > This might be the wrong list or a topic I somehow missed, but the only > statement on the matter I can find is ".. who want EJB 1.1 compatibility". Is > OpenEJB intended to eventually implement the 2.0 standard, or is 1.1 the final > goal of the project? > > On a related note I've been very impressed with the ease of setup and use so > far, the development team has done a great job :) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > http://OpenEJB.sf.net > OpenEJB-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openejb-user ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ http://OpenEJB.sf.net OpenEJB-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openejb-user
