On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 21:04, Michael Opdenacker via lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> wrote: > The first prototype would only target the below architectures: > > - "genericx86-64" architecture through the "genericx86-64" machine > (https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/tree/meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/genericx86-64.conf) > > - "arm64" architecture through the "qemuarm64" (and later "genericarm64" > when > hready) machine > (https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/tree/meta/conf/machine/qemuarm64.conf) > > Testing would happen through QEMU system emulation.
I have to question these choices, particularly generix86-64. It is very important that the binary distribution makes a good first impression at runtime, and a major part of that is that the common x86 hardware, including various peripherals, just works. Which is not the case with genericx86-64: machines from meta-intel are a far better choice. And the same goes for booting in qemu: qemux86-64 is specifically tweaked and optimized to work well in that environment, and again will make a better impression. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1849): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1849 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/102755562/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
