Hi Mark
On 24.11.23 at 17:01, Mark Hatle wrote:
In the past, the statement was made that we would generate source
packages that would include the full source (as referenced in the ${S}
directory of the build), but there was no promise that a 'source
package' would build, using the tooling of the package manager.
This allowed us to clearly have a license compliance "source package",
but the reference back to the full build was ALWAYS "the build
system". I'd say this continues to be the model I would support.
(The package beyond license compliance is also needed for debugging
things on the board.)
binary package(s)
source package
original build environment
Right, I agree, and Alex Kanavin's "build bundles" would be a great match.
Cheers
Michael.
--
Michael Opdenacker, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1876):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1876
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/102755562/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
