On 2018年03月30日 15:05, Patchwork wrote:
== Series Details ==

Series: Upgrade 7 packages
Revision: 1
URL   : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/11622/
State : failure

== Summary ==


Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is
an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed
series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:



* Issue             LIC_FILES_CHKSUM changed on target libgpg-error but there is no 
"License-Update" tag in commit message 
[test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned]
   Suggested fix    Include "License-Update: <description>" into the commit 
message with a brief description
   Current checksum file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552         
            file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1             
        
file://src/gpg-error.h.in;endline=23;md5=beae1e44d8d5c265d194760276033a7c       
              file://src/init.c;endline=20;md5=872b2389fe9bae7ffb80d2b91225afbc
   New checksum     file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552         
            file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1             
        
file://src/gpg-error.h.in;endline=23;md5=fc7423b56d5f7163a9a2acf9fe2f8d6b       
              file://src/init.c;endline=20;md5=872b2389fe9bae7ffb80d2b91225afbc

It already includes "License-Update: <description>":
...
1. License-Update: update years from 2003-2004 to 2001-2018,
   and add a new line 'SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+'
...

Should I remove the starting "1. "?

* Issue             Patches not removed from tree [test_src_uri_left_files]
   Suggested fix    Amend the patch containing the software patch file removal
   Patch            avoid-host-contamination.patch
   Patch            mkdir-p.patch
   Patch            do-not-check-local-libpng-source.patch
   Patch            ghostscript-9.02-genarch.patch
   Patch            ghostscript-9.21-prevent_recompiling.patch
   Patch            ghostscript-9.16-Werror-return-type.patch
   Patch            cups-no-gcrypt.patch
   Patch            ghostscript-9.15-parallel-make.patch

It already removes them from tree.
Should I git format-patch without "-M"?

//Hongxu



If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the
mailing list ([email protected]) raising your concerns.
Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new
version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the
version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] ->
[PATCH v3] -> ...).

---
Guidelines:     
https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest
Test suite:     http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe


--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to