On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 15:26 +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote: > On 2018年03月30日 15:05, Patchwork wrote: > > > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: Upgrade 7 packages > > Revision: 1 > > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/11622/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. > > This is > > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the > > proposed > > series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: > > > > > > > > * Issue LIC_FILES_CHKSUM changed on target libgpg-error > > but there is no "License-Update" tag in commit message > > [test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned] > > Suggested fix Include "License-Update: <description>" into > > the commit message with a brief description > > Current checksum > > file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552 > > file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1 > > file://src/gpg- > > error.h.in;endline=23;md5=beae1e44d8d5c265d194760276033a7c > > file://src/init.c;endline=20;md5=872b2389fe9bae7ffb80d2 > > b91225afbc > > New > > checksum file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552 > > file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206 > > a5b0a1 file://src/gpg- > > error.h.in;endline=23;md5=fc7423b56d5f7163a9a2acf9fe2f8d6b > > file://src/init.c;endline=20;md5=872b2389fe9bae7ffb80d2 > > b91225afbc > It already includes "License-Update: <description>": > ... > 1. License-Update: update years from 2003-2004 to 2001-2018, > and add a new line 'SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+' > ... > > Should I remove the starting "1. "?
Yes, the "1. " is why its not understanding what you added. > > > * Issue Patches not removed from tree > > [test_src_uri_left_files] > > Suggested fix Amend the patch containing the software patch > > file removal > > Patch avoid-host-contamination.patch > > Patch mkdir-p.patch > > Patch do-not-check-local-libpng-source.patch > > Patch ghostscript-9.02-genarch.patch > > Patch ghostscript-9.21-prevent_recompiling.patch > > Patch ghostscript-9.16-Werror-return-type.patch > > Patch cups-no-gcrypt.patch > > Patch ghostscript-9.15-parallel-make.patch > It already removes them from tree. > Should I git format-patch without "-M"? To be clear, these patches are all renamed. I think patchtest is failing to understand the rename. Please continue to send with -M but lets file a bug against patchtest to see if we can fix this issue. We could avoid the issue by not renaming patches. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
