On 2018年03月30日 15:44, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 15:26 +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
On 2018年03月30日 15:05, Patchwork wrote:
== Series Details ==
Series: Upgrade 7 packages
Revision: 1
URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/11622/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core.
This is
an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the
proposed
series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:
* Issue LIC_FILES_CHKSUM changed on target libgpg-error
but there is no "License-Update" tag in commit message
[test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned]
Suggested fix Include "License-Update: <description>" into
the commit message with a brief description
Current checksum
file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552
file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1
file://src/gpg-
error.h.in;endline=23;md5=beae1e44d8d5c265d194760276033a7c
file://src/init.c;endline=20;md5=872b2389fe9bae7ffb80d2
b91225afbc
New
checksum file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552
file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206
a5b0a1 file://src/gpg-
error.h.in;endline=23;md5=fc7423b56d5f7163a9a2acf9fe2f8d6b
file://src/init.c;endline=20;md5=872b2389fe9bae7ffb80d2
b91225afbc
It already includes "License-Update: <description>":
...
1. License-Update: update years from 2003-2004 to 2001-2018,
and add a new line 'SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+'
...
Should I remove the starting "1. "?
Yes, the "1. " is why its not understanding what you added.
OK, V2 incoming
* Issue Patches not removed from tree
[test_src_uri_left_files]
Suggested fix Amend the patch containing the software patch
file removal
Patch avoid-host-contamination.patch
Patch mkdir-p.patch
Patch do-not-check-local-libpng-source.patch
Patch ghostscript-9.02-genarch.patch
Patch ghostscript-9.21-prevent_recompiling.patch
Patch ghostscript-9.16-Werror-return-type.patch
Patch cups-no-gcrypt.patch
Patch ghostscript-9.15-parallel-make.patch
It already removes them from tree.
Should I git format-patch without "-M"?
To be clear, these patches are all renamed. I think patchtest is
failing to understand the rename. Please continue to send with -M but
lets file a bug against patchtest to see if we can fix this issue.
Got it, file YOCTO #12636 to trace the issue
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12636
//Hongxu
We could avoid the issue by not renaming patches.
Cheers,
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
