On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 1:20 PM Ross Burton <r...@burtonini.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This isn't equivalent - it will cause a change in behaviour for anyone
> > using PACKAGECONFIG += "foo" from a .bbappend.
>
> Correct, but this is likely the only recipe in the greater ecosystem
> which has this behaviour, so I'm not that bothered to be honest. :)

The only recipe? There are many recipes which set a default
PACKAGECONFIG with ?= and many which set it with ??=. Your change is
effectively switching the vim recipe from one approach to the other.
The fact that adding PACKAGECONFIG options from a .bbappend with +=
sometimes works OK and sometimes not is a source of confusion for new
users.

You are right that no one seems to care though...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#158997): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/158997
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87406894/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to