On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 2:33 PM Richard Purdie
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 13:45 -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 1:20 PM Ross Burton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > This isn't equivalent - it will cause a change in behaviour for anyone
> > > > using PACKAGECONFIG += "foo" from a .bbappend.
> > >
> > > Correct, but this is likely the only recipe in the greater ecosystem
> > > which has this behaviour, so I'm not that bothered to be honest. :)
> >
> > The only recipe? There are many recipes which set a default
> > PACKAGECONFIG with ?= and many which set it with ??=. Your change is
> > effectively switching the vim recipe from one approach to the other.
> > The fact that adding PACKAGECONFIG options from a .bbappend with +=
> > sometimes works OK and sometimes not is a source of confusion for new
> > users.
> >
> > You are right that no one seems to care though...
>
> Some of us very much do care, it is actually bothering me a lot and I've 
> posted
> several times on the architecture list about this kind of issue.
>
> We haven't worked out what we can agree to do about it though :(.

As a first, very easy, step, make a statement here on the mailing list
that all PACKAGECONFIG defaults should be assigned with ?= instead of
??= and fix the recipes in oe-core accordingly.

As a second step, the parser could generate a warning (or even an
error) if any variable is assigned to with only ??= and += (the end
result of that combination is not what any user would expect and I
doubt if any legitimate use case relies on it).
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#159112): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/159112
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87406894/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to