Hi, Alex > Can you explain a bit more? Why and how is it not correct? Why isn't a > similar fix > needed in other uses of oe_multilib_header?
Reference to https://man.archlinux.org/man/libbsd.7, by default, libbsd is built in an overlay mode, the includes in this case should be the usual system ones, such as <unistd.h> without namespaced with bsd/. It seems that libbsd is special. Best regards Lei > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 1:33 PM > To: Lei, Maohui <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH v2] libbsd: Fix conflict error when enable > multilib. > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 03:23, leimaohui via lists.openembedded.org > <[email protected]> wrote: > > - The path of cdefs-64.h and cdefs-32.h in cdefs.h is not correct for > > libbsd after > enable oe_multilib_header on cdefs.h. It is necessary to fix the path. > > +do_install:append () { > > + oe_multilib_header bsd/sys/cdefs.h > > + sed -i 's:#include <bsd/sys/cdefs:#include <sys/cdefs:g' > > +${D}${includedir}/bsd/sys/cdefs.h > > Can you explain a bit more? Why and how is it not correct? Why isn't a > similar fix > needed in other uses of oe_multilib_header? > > Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#198526): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/198526 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105590332/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
