Ping
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > <[email protected]> On Behalf Of leimaohui via > lists.openembedded.org > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 9:16 AM > To: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH v2] libbsd: Fix conflict error when enable > multilib. > > Hi, Alex > > > Can you explain a bit more? Why and how is it not correct? Why isn't a > > similar fix needed in other uses of oe_multilib_header? > > Reference to https://man.archlinux.org/man/libbsd.7, by default, libbsd is > built > in an overlay mode, the includes in this case should be the usual system ones, > such as <unistd.h> without namespaced with bsd/. > It seems that libbsd is special. > > Best regards > Lei > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 1:33 PM > > To: Lei, Maohui <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH v2] libbsd: Fix conflict error when enable > > multilib. > > > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 03:23, leimaohui via lists.openembedded.org > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > - The path of cdefs-64.h and cdefs-32.h in cdefs.h is not correct > > > for libbsd after > > enable oe_multilib_header on cdefs.h. It is necessary to fix the path. > > > +do_install:append () { > > > + oe_multilib_header bsd/sys/cdefs.h > > > + sed -i 's:#include <bsd/sys/cdefs:#include <sys/cdefs:g' > > > +${D}${includedir}/bsd/sys/cdefs.h > > > > Can you explain a bit more? Why and how is it not correct? Why isn't a > > similar fix needed in other uses of oe_multilib_header? > > > > Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#198637): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/198637 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105590332/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
