On Tue, 19 May 2026 at 20:02, Ricardo de Araujo (Salveti) <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 1:29 PM Michael Opdenacker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 5/19/26 1:59 PM, Joao Marcos Costa wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> Any update on this patch? > > >> Building u-boot-tools on master for the "qemuriscv64" machine is > > >> still broken. > > >> > > >> For people facing this too, a workaround is the add back > > >> "libyaml-native" to depends in meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common.inc > > >> > > >> How come the autobuilder didn't catch this issue on one of our > > >> officially supported machines? > > >> Cheers > > >> Michael. > > >> > > > > > > The same patch [1] must be applied to u-boot-tools' sources to fix > > > this, rather than adding back the dependency. > > > > > > That said, unfortunately I don't know what is the current status of > > > Ricardo's patch, nor how come the autobuilder didn't catch this issue. > > > > > > [1] > > > meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/files/0001-scripts-dtc-drop-yaml-in-DT-validation.patch > > > > > From what I understood, his patch was rejected. > > It wasn't really rejected, we have basically 3 options to solve the > issue, and the one I decided to use was basically the same one we > already had before here, as I believe adding another common file or > duplicating the patch line just to reuse the common file is not really > that great either. > > But I can send another version duplicating the patch line in both > repos, if that is preferred by everyone.
I think that's the best option. -- With best wishes Dmitry
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#237344): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/237344 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119204092/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
