On Thu, 2026-07-02 at 10:36 +0200, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Thanks for the new version.
> 
> I just note we have some intermittent failure. So far I only saw that
> on
> debian11 workers, so maybe it is related to the host distro.
> 
> ERROR: systemd-hwdb-native-261-r0 do_compile: Execution of
> '/srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/meta-virt/build/build/tmp/work/x86_64-
> linux/systemd-hwdb-native/261/temp/run.do_compile.3747249' failed
> with exit code 1
> ...
> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/mount.c: In function
> > ‘mount_setattr_shim’:
> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/libc-shim.h:71:32: error:
> > ‘__NR_mount_setattr’ undeclared (first use in this function); did
> > you mean ‘mount_setattr’?
> >     71 |                 return syscall(__NR_##func,
> > _SHIM_NAME(__VA_ARGS__));                                \
> >        |                                ^~~~~
> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/mount.c:35:1: note: in
> > expansion of macro ‘DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM’
> >     35 | DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM(mount_setattr, int,
> >        | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/libc-shim.h:71:32: note: each
> > undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it
> > appears in
> >     71 |                 return syscall(__NR_##func,
> > _SHIM_NAME(__VA_ARGS__));                                \
> >        |                                ^~~~~
> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/mount.c:35:1: note: in
> > expansion of macro ‘DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM’
> >     35 | DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM(mount_setattr, int,
> >        | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/libc-shim.h:72:9: error:
> > control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
> >     72 |         }
> >        |         ^
> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/mount.c:35:1: note: in
> > expansion of macro ‘DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM’
> >     35 | DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM(mount_setattr, int,
> >        | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> 
> 

did v2 work? I saw it was in master-next.

The only difference between v3 and v2 is the meson wrapper and it
should not affect.

Daniel

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#240027): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/240027
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120045142/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to