On Thu Jul 2, 2026 at 10:58 AM CEST, Daniel Turull wrote:
> On Thu, 2026-07-02 at 10:36 +0200, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Daniel,
>> 
>> Thanks for the new version.
>> 
>> I just note we have some intermittent failure. So far I only saw that
>> on
>> debian11 workers, so maybe it is related to the host distro.
>> 
>> ERROR: systemd-hwdb-native-261-r0 do_compile: Execution of
>> '/srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/meta-virt/build/build/tmp/work/x86_64-
>> linux/systemd-hwdb-native/261/temp/run.do_compile.3747249' failed
>> with exit code 1
>> ...
>> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/mount.c: In function
>> > ‘mount_setattr_shim’:
>> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/libc-shim.h:71:32: error:
>> > ‘__NR_mount_setattr’ undeclared (first use in this function); did
>> > you mean ‘mount_setattr’?
>> >     71 |                 return syscall(__NR_##func,
>> > _SHIM_NAME(__VA_ARGS__));                                \
>> >        |                                ^~~~~
>> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/mount.c:35:1: note: in
>> > expansion of macro ‘DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM’
>> >     35 | DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM(mount_setattr, int,
>> >        | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/libc-shim.h:71:32: note: each
>> > undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it
>> > appears in
>> >     71 |                 return syscall(__NR_##func,
>> > _SHIM_NAME(__VA_ARGS__));                                \
>> >        |                                ^~~~~
>> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/mount.c:35:1: note: in
>> > expansion of macro ‘DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM’
>> >     35 | DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM(mount_setattr, int,
>> >        | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/libc-shim.h:72:9: error:
>> > control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
>> >     72 |         }
>> >        |         ^
>> > ../sources/systemd-hwdb-261/src/libc/mount.c:35:1: note: in
>> > expansion of macro ‘DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM’
>> >     35 | DEFINE_SYSCALL_SHIM(mount_setattr, int,
>> >        | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
> did v2 work? I saw it was in master-next.
>
> The only difference between v3 and v2 is the meson wrapper and it
> should not affect.
>
> Daniel

I suspect we had the same issue with v2, we just have been a bit
(un)lucky as it never ran on a Debian 11 worker.

-- 
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#240030): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/240030
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120045142/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to