On Fri, 2026-08-28 at 09:46 -0600, Alejandro Hernandez wrote: > > On 8/27/2026 1:53 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2026-08-26 at 21:47 +0100, Richard Purdie via > > lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > > On Wed, 2026-08-26 at 14:08 -0600, Alejandro Hernandez wrote: > > > > On 8/26/2026 1:17 PM, Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2026-08-26 at 11:25 -0700, Dora, Sunil Kumar via > > > > > lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alejandro, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for chasing this one down. Small notes on v3: > > > > > > > > > > > > The commit is tagged [YOCTO #15554], but that bug is > > > > > > "reproducibility > > > > > > failures with 'rustdoc' on rust 1.75" (path-length > > > > > > dependent), > > > > > > RESOLVED FIXED > > > > > > since 2024-08-01 via codegen-units=1 / lto=off. > > > > > > > > > > > > What you describe here - artifacts differing by build host > > > > > > arch, > > > > > > causing > > > > > > cross-architecture sstate matches - looks like: > > > > > > > > > > > > [YOCTO #16376] AB-INT: build system architecture > > > > > > reproducibility issue > > > > > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16376 > > > > > > > > > > > > which is still open. Could you retag it in v4, unless you > > > > > > had a > > > > > > reason to > > > > > > point at 15554 that I'm missing? > > > > > > --- > > > > > > One pointer that may or may not be relevant: the 1.97.1 > > > > > > upgrade > > > > > > (65271a5d3b) > > > > > > carries an LLVM backport: > > > > > > > > > > > > 0043-LoopUnroll-Iterate-exit-fold-candidates-in- > > > > > > determini.patch > > > > > > > > > > > > added for a repro issue seen with rust 1.97.0. I haven't > > > > > > looked > > > > > > at whether it > > > > > > interacts with the SVH path at all - just flagging it in > > > > > > case > > > > > > it's useful context. > > > > Hey Richard, > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the incorrect tag. > > > No problem, that is at least easily fixed! > > > > > > > I'll look into these failures as well and send a v4 > > > Thanks! I appreciate the work on this as it should improve things > > > a > > > lot. > > > > > > > > I put v3 in for testing on the autobuilder and it looks > > > > > promising, > > > > > there are some rust test suite failures though: > > > > > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/28/builds/4472 > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/66/builds/4577 > > > > > > > > > > and probably more to follow. We may need to exclude those > > > > > tests? > > > > > > > > > > I also triggered the reproducibility test targets: > > > > > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/121/builds/3 > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/119/builds/3 > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/120/builds/3 > > > > > > > > > > those builds are ongoing. > > > One of these completed: > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/120/builds/3 > > > > > > which leads to: > > > > > > https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20260826-plagtpam/packages/diff-html/ > > > > > > There looks to be a locale issue, some python config tweaks, > > > curl- > > > config binconfig needing a tweak and a smaller rust issue left. > > > > > > Definitely progress, much fewer recipes showing issues and fewer > > > binary > > > ones and more text ones left... > > Sadly the other two test runs looked less promising: > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/119/builds/3 > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/121/builds/3 > > > > both of which have a lot of rust related looking differences :/ > > Apologies, I got a bit confused, is the ask to send a v4 with the > correct tag and then look at other reproducibility issues?. > > or are these reproducibility issues related to the patch and need to > be addressed before sending a v4?
I'm probably a bit confused too. There are still reproducibility issues in there that look rust related and I can't really tell if those are additional issues or whether the original fix isn't working. I suspect I need your help to work that out... Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#244557): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/244557 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120939810/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
