On 8/27/2026 1:53 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2026-08-26 at 21:47 +0100, Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
On Wed, 2026-08-26 at 14:08 -0600, Alejandro Hernandez wrote:
On 8/26/2026 1:17 PM, Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
On Wed, 2026-08-26 at 11:25 -0700, Dora, Sunil Kumar via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
Thanks for chasing this one down. Small notes on v3:
The commit is tagged [YOCTO #15554], but that bug is
"reproducibility
failures with 'rustdoc' on rust 1.75" (path-length dependent),
RESOLVED FIXED
since 2024-08-01 via codegen-units=1 / lto=off.
What you describe here - artifacts differing by build host arch,
causing
cross-architecture sstate matches - looks like:
[YOCTO #16376] AB-INT: build system architecture
reproducibility issue
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16376
which is still open. Could you retag it in v4, unless you had a
reason to
point at 15554 that I'm missing?
---
One pointer that may or may not be relevant: the 1.97.1 upgrade
(65271a5d3b)
carries an LLVM backport:
0043-LoopUnroll-Iterate-exit-fold-candidates-in-
determini.patch
added for a repro issue seen with rust 1.97.0. I haven't looked
at whether it
interacts with the SVH path at all - just flagging it in case
it's useful context.
Hey Richard,
Sorry for the incorrect tag.
No problem, that is at least easily fixed!
I'll look into these failures as well and send a v4
Thanks! I appreciate the work on this as it should improve things a
lot.
I put v3 in for testing on the autobuilder and it looks promising,
there are some rust test suite failures though:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/28/builds/4472
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/66/builds/4577
and probably more to follow. We may need to exclude those tests?
I also triggered the reproducibility test targets:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/121/builds/3
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/119/builds/3
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/120/builds/3
those builds are ongoing.
One of these completed:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/120/builds/3
which leads to:
https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20260826-plagtpam/packages/diff-html/
There looks to be a locale issue, some python config tweaks, curl-
config binconfig needing a tweak and a smaller rust issue left.
Definitely progress, much fewer recipes showing issues and fewer binary
ones and more text ones left...
Sadly the other two test runs looked less promising:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/119/builds/3
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/121/builds/3
both of which have a lot of rust related looking differences :/
Cheers,
Richard
Hey Richard,
Apologies, I got a bit confused, is the ask to send a v4 with the
correct tag and then look at other reproducibility issues?.
or are these reproducibility issues related to the patch and need to be
addressed before sending a v4?
Alejandro
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#244555):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/244555
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120939810/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
