On Wednesday 20 June 2012 10:31:40 Bruce Ashfield wrote: > From: Liang Li <[email protected]> >... > +EXTRA_OEMAKE = \ > + '-C ${S}/tools/perf \ > + O=${B} \ > + CROSS_COMPILE=${TARGET_PREFIX} \ > + ARCH=${ARCH} \ > + CC="${CC}" \ > + AR="${AR}" \ > + prefix=/usr \ > + NO_GTK2=1 NO_NEWT=1 NO_DWARF=1 \
Coincidentally, I've just noticed that the current (kernel integrated) perf package can sometimes depend on gtk+/glib-2.0 or not depending on whether these are available when the kernel is built. Presumably NO_GTK2=1 above disables gtk+ support and thus would prevent this? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
