On 12-06-20 11:25 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 10:31:40 Bruce Ashfield wrote:
From: Liang Li<[email protected]>
...
+EXTRA_OEMAKE = \
+ '-C ${S}/tools/perf \
+ O=${B} \
+ CROSS_COMPILE=${TARGET_PREFIX} \
+ ARCH=${ARCH} \
+ CC="${CC}" \
+ AR="${AR}" \
+ prefix=/usr \
+ NO_GTK2=1 NO_NEWT=1 NO_DWARF=1 \
Coincidentally, I've just noticed that the current (kernel integrated) perf
package can sometimes depend on gtk+/glib-2.0 or not depending on whether
these are available when the kernel is built. Presumably NO_GTK2=1 above
disables gtk+ support and thus would prevent this?
That was the plan. It hard disables it for now, and once we have
a more flexible package, we can add some optional dependencies and
features back into the equation.
Cheers,
Bruce
Cheers,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
