On 31 March 2014 18:03, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > I kind of disagree with that, the LSB image can take into account > configuration in other parts of the system. If pam isn't configured, I'm > not sure that should automatically make it completely unbuildable...
An image that claims to be LSB compliant but due to not-immediately-obvious DISTRO_FEATURES isn't actually doesn't seem like a good idea to me, fwiw. If the LSB image requires PAM, X11 and so on then it should require the features. Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
