On 08/10/2015 02:13 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 08/08/2015 08:09 PM, Philip Balister wrote: >>> By 'self-sustaining' I mean 'being able to continuously produce quality >>> work'. Looking at layers in meta-openembedded, not all of them are of >>> high quality. Meta-gnome in particular is badly out of date, because no >>> one wants to maintain it properly. If oe-core starts taking a lot more >>> volunteer contributions, and the same thing happens (a volunteer >>> contributes a large set of recipes, then disappears), what is supposed >>> to happen then? >> >> You are missing the point. We now use layers to segregate sets of >> recipes o stuff that is not interesting to many people and becomes >> obsolete may decline without compromising heavily used layers. This is >> all part of the evolution of OpenEmbedded over many, many years. >> >> If people lose interest in meta-gplv2, then so be it. > > This is perfectly fine with me. However, the subject has been whether > the scope of *oe-core/poky* can be expanded without compromising
What is Poky? Philip > quality. I'm not sure at which point it got confused with general OE, so > I can only refer you back to several emails up this thread: > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-July/108037.html > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-July/108167.html > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-July/108208.html > > > > Alex > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core