Hello,

Am 20.10.2016 um 12:44 schrieb Peter Kjellerstedt:
>> -----Original Message-----
-Snipp-
>> Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Remove $COREBASE/LICENSE from
-Snipp-
> 
> Even after this is applied, there are still nine recipes in OE-Core 
> that reference ${COREBASE}/LICENSE. There is also an example in 
> dev-manual-common-tasks.xml with a reference to ${COREBASE}/LICENSE. 
> AFAICT, they all look just like the ones that this patch removes. 
> Any reason they were not fixed as well?
> 
"Why not patch the nine remaining recipes": see my cover letter
"[OE-core][PATCH 0/1] $COREBASE/LICENSE in LIC_FILES_CHKSUM":

>>> I patched out the global LICENSE file from all those recipes that
>>> are short enough and where I feel reasonably confident of not
>>> having actually changed the claimed license terms in any way.
>>> 
>>> There are additional recipes that reference the global LICENSE
>>> file, but where I am not sure if a less blanket license declaration
>>> is appropriate or not. Especially for meta-toolchain and
>>> build-appliance-image, the global LICENSE is probably correct.
>>> Any comments?

So please comment away  :-)

> There are also 17 recipes in OpenEmbedded with a reference to 
> ${COREBASE}/LICENSE. They too need to be fixed.
> 
Same as for dev-manual-common-tasks.xml: I was not a aware of those and
not all belong on the openembedded-core list. And for the example: it
should only be patched once this patch for formfactor_0.0.bb is accepted.

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to