> Is it practical? I think the answer is no. In my experience, tools > like selinux have a tendency to require inordinate amounts of > administrative burden that just isn't practical in a development > environment. I think requiring that selinux be disabled on build > hosts > is a reasonable requirement, and will avoid wasting a lot of cycles > that > should be spent on OE, and not on administration (or sending lots of > emails). What about supporting only the unconfined user selinux type(unconfined_u),in targeted mode? Denis.
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
