On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 04:59:41PM -0500, Philip Balister wrote: > On 11/12/2009 04:42 PM, GNUtoo wrote: > >>Is it practical? I think the answer is no. In my experience, tools > >>like selinux have a tendency to require inordinate amounts of > >>administrative burden that just isn't practical in a development > >>environment. I think requiring that selinux be disabled on build > >>hosts > >>is a reasonable requirement, and will avoid wasting a lot of cycles > >>that > >>should be spent on OE, and not on administration (or sending lots of > >>emails). > >What about supporting only the unconfined user selinux > >type(unconfined_u),in targeted mode? > > I'm running default Selinux on F11, I don't think we can just say OE > must have SELinux turned off. > And the SELinux problem doesnt seem to trip up my SELinux F11.
Graeme _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
