On 11/12/2009 04:42 PM, GNUtoo wrote:
Is it practical? I think the answer is no. In my experience, tools
like selinux have a tendency to require inordinate amounts of
administrative burden that just isn't practical in a development
environment. I think requiring that selinux be disabled on build
hosts
is a reasonable requirement, and will avoid wasting a lot of cycles
that
should be spent on OE, and not on administration (or sending lots of
emails).
What about supporting only the unconfined user selinux
type(unconfined_u),in targeted mode?
I'm running default Selinux on F11, I don't think we can just say OE
must have SELinux turned off.
Philip
Denis.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
