В сообщении от Среда 15 декабря 2010 22:47:05 автор Maupin, Chase написал: > > Missed that change. Seems wrong to me. And I still think that it belongs > > to > > libcrypto, not openssl since you can easily not install openssl binary > > and still use it with tuned openssl.cnf in your apps. > > So it seems like there are two packages that need this default openssl.cnf > file, the libcrypto and openssl packages. Would it perhaps be a better > idea to pull the configuration file into its own package and then set the > RDEPENDS for the libcrypto and openssl packages to use the openssl > configuration package? That way you can still have multiple versions of > libcrypto (like Koen was trying to do) and have the default file shared > between both packages that need it.
openssl is rdepending on libcrypto anyway (it's linked with it and I don't think it'll change any time soon). But configs for different versions can be conflicting, so I'm not sure this kind of approach solves anything. -- http://roman.khimov.ru mailto: [email protected] gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
