В сообщении от Четверг 16 декабря 2010 17:10:37 автор Koen Kooi написал: > >>> So it seems like there are two packages that need this default > >> openssl.cnf > >> > >>> file, the libcrypto and openssl packages. Would it perhaps be a > >>> better idea to pull the configuration file into its own package and > >>> then set > >> the > >>> RDEPENDS for the libcrypto and openssl packages to use the openssl > >>> configuration package? That way you can still have multiple versions > >>> of libcrypto (like Koen was trying to do) and have the default file > >>> shared between both packages that need it. > >> > >> openssl is rdepending on libcrypto anyway (it's linked with it and I > >> don't think it'll change any time soon). But configs for different > >> versions can be > >> conflicting, so I'm not sure this kind of approach solves anything. > > > > I noticed that. I think the only thing that putting this into its own > > package would solve is addressing Koen's comment about having multiple > > versions of libcrypto installed. > > > > Koen, can you comment on your change that moved the openssl.cnf file to > > the misc package? Do you still need to be able to install multiple > > versions of libcrypto? > > Yes, I still need to be able to do that, couldn't you just add an > rrecommend for -misc?
To get all -misc stuff? I'd opt for putting openssl.cnf in its own package and setting it as RRECOMMENDS for libcrypto in that case. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
