> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Roman I Khimov > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 8:57 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [oe] [RFC] move openssl.cnf file into base openssl package > > В сообщении от Четверг 16 декабря 2010 17:30:58 автор Maupin, Chase > написал: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of > > > Roman I Khimov > > > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 8:32 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [oe] [RFC] move openssl.cnf file into base openssl > package > > > > > > В сообщении от Четверг 16 декабря 2010 17:10:37 автор Koen Kooi > написал: > > > > >>> So it seems like there are two packages that need this default > > > > >> > > > > >> openssl.cnf > > > > >> > > > > >>> file, the libcrypto and openssl packages. Would it perhaps be > a > > > > >>> better idea to pull the configuration file into its own package > > > > >>> and then set > > > > >> > > > > >> the > > > > >> > > > > >>> RDEPENDS for the libcrypto and openssl packages to use the > openssl > > > > >>> configuration package? That way you can still have multiple > > > > > > versions > > > > > > > >>> of libcrypto (like Koen was trying to do) and have the default > > > > >>> file shared between both packages that need it. > > > > >> > > > > >> openssl is rdepending on libcrypto anyway (it's linked with it > and I > > > > >> don't think it'll change any time soon). But configs for > different > > > > >> versions can be > > > > >> conflicting, so I'm not sure this kind of approach solves > anything. > > > > > > > > > > I noticed that. I think the only thing that putting this into its > > > > > own package would solve is addressing Koen's comment about having > > > > > multiple versions of libcrypto installed. > > > > > > > > > > Koen, can you comment on your change that moved the openssl.cnf > file > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > the misc package? Do you still need to be able to install > multiple > > > > > versions of libcrypto? > > > > > > > > Yes, I still need to be able to do that, couldn't you just add an > > > > rrecommend for -misc? > > > > > > To get all -misc stuff? I'd opt for putting openssl.cnf in its own > > > package and > > > setting it as RRECOMMENDS for libcrypto in that case. > > > > Agreed. Although would you say RRECOMMENDS or RDEPENDS? > > I've just said above, RRECOMMENDS. Most applications using libcrypto can > work > without a default config file. They even worked for a long time before > I've > packaged it. But you get it installed by default with RRECOMMENDS, and > only if > you know what you're doing you add it in BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS or delete it > in > some other way. > > Speaking of which, it should also be listed in CONFFILES, missed that in > March.
I'll submit a patch for this today. Thanks for the input. > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
