On 13/01/2011 16:13, Tom Rini wrote:
On 01/13/2011 12:39 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
On 13/01/2011 01:30, Tom Rini wrote:
On 01/12/2011 02:20 PM, Eric Bénard wrote:
tested with kernel headers 2.6.31& 2.6.37 : both compile fine.
Is there a reason to not switch to 4.5.20, or even newer instead?
I would like to do that but I don't know if 4.5.20 needs patches.
I haven't tried .37, but it doesn't for .34 (when .14 does). To be clear, I'm
suggesting we look at removing the D_P = -1 from .20. My assumption is that
since .20 is the latest it probably doesn't need ARM EABI patches (and
probably not the SH patches either).
OK lets go
Eric
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
