> On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:56 AM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'd prefer to do it once and avoid adding another recipe and handle > same problems we had solved there. Also this allows for example the > use of i.MX patches on meta-fsl-arm.
My usecase is not i.MX moreover I do not have i.MX h/w to test as well, current set work fine for the architectures I need it for, if someone wants to help in testing on other machines, its welcome. however as I said, it will be in subsequent work to unite both recipes due to the overhead as explained in last email. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
