On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:56 AM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> I'd prefer to do it once and avoid adding another recipe and handle >> same problems we had solved there. Also this allows for example the >> use of i.MX patches on meta-fsl-arm. > > My usecase is not i.MX moreover I do not have i.MX h/w to test as well, > current set work fine for the architectures I need it for, if someone wants > to help in testing on other machines, its welcome. however as I said, it will > be in subsequent work to unite both recipes due to the overhead as explained > in last email.
I am not asking you to test cef3 on i.MX, this is fine. I don't want another giant build recipe with duplication. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
