On Mar 24, 2015 9:36 AM, "Otavio Salvador" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:56 AM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> I'd prefer to do it once and avoid adding another recipe and handle > >> same problems we had solved there. Also this allows for example the > >> use of i.MX patches on meta-fsl-arm. > > > > My usecase is not i.MX moreover I do not have i.MX h/w to test as well, current set work fine for the architectures I need it for, if someone wants to help in testing on other machines, its welcome. however as I said, it will be in subsequent work to unite both recipes due to the overhead as explained in last email. > > I am not asking you to test cef3 on i.MX, this is fine. I don't want > another giant build recipe with duplication.
I am aware of that. This let's other folks hands on it with a working version. Moving cef to latest chromium is a bigger exercise and will delay this. That's the motivation. > > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
