Well, I would think the diaspora spread is rather unofficial and hasn't gone too far, and Weta's in-house usage can still be considered proprietary. So at this very moment the legacy support is still restricted to a very limited group.
Consider this the last chance of altering the file extension to something memorizable. In a year's time that chance is gone. I do think sticking to the *xr template makes a whole lot more sense in the long run. Chances of confusion with director files is rather minimal, so even .dxr would be appropriate. Blochi On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Christopher Horvath wrote: > For what it's worth, 'odz' has a fair bit of traction, as there's been quite > a few folks working with these at Weta, and where the diaspora has taken > them. While the notational convenience of '*xr' is attractive, my vote is > 'odz' because it's already somewhat established. > > Chris _______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list Openexr-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
