Hi Terry,

Here is the exact configuration I used for NOX (RouteFlow).  My controller was 
192.168.1.17, my ip was 192.168.1.100.


openflow
   enable
   controller-id 2 ip 192.168.1.17 controller-interface vlan 3
   instance "routeflow"
      listen-port
      member vlan 1
      controller-id 2
      connection-interruption-mode fail-standalone
      enable
      exit

vlan 1
   name "DEFAULT_VLAN"
   no untagged 1-2
   untagged 3-24
   ip address dhcp-bootp
   exit
vlan 3
   name "CNTL_VLAN"
   untagged 2
   ip address 192.168.1.100 255.255.255.0
   exit

On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:11 PM, terryxing <xingtia...@gmail.com> wrote:

> thanks Noble
> 
> do you have to add that port into vlan 10? untagged or tagged ?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On Feb 21, 2013 11:09 PM, "Steve Noble" <sno...@sonn.com> wrote:
> I think you cannot.  I think i used vlan 10.
> 
> On Feb 21, 2013 12:14 PM, "terryxing" <xingtia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW, I can understand that controller communication needs separate VLAN. Can 
> I use VLAN 1 as the VLAN to communicate with controller from OFS ? 
> 
> The controller use port 12 to connect to the HP OFS. Should I add the port 
> into the specific VLAN ? like vlan 1 ? Port 12 should be added as untagged or 
> tagged ?
> 
> I just wanna make controller and OFS connected first.
> 
> Thanks very much.
> 
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, terryxing <xingtia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks very much for your timely reply.
> 
> The thing is,  I use port 12 as the port for communicating with controller. I 
> need to specify a vlan for communication betwee OFS and POX. I used VLAN 1, 
> but the status is still disconnected.  They can ping each other but can not 
> connected.
> 
> Another weird thing is that I use port 1 and 2 for connecting two physical 
> servers so that VMs can talk to each other.  As I tested yesterday, the weird 
> thing is, even I did not run the openflow, two VMs can still ping each other 
> through port 1 and 2.  Based on my understanding, if I enabled openflow on 
> the HP switch, without running application on controller, like l2_learning 
> switch, the traffic of port 1 and 2 can not be forwarded.
> 
> Any thought ?
> 
> Thanks very much.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Steve Noble <sno...@sonn.com> wrote:
> Hi Terry,
> 
> When I did my testing I used the configuration outlined in this post
> 
> http://www.routeranalysis.com/state-of-openflow-2012-day-56-notes-on-hp/
> 
> Let me know of that helps. 
> On Feb 20, 2013 4:01 PM, "terryxing" <xingtia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> I am configuring the HP 3500yl openflow switch. I already burn the firmware 
> K15.10 version into the secondary OS of the HP openflow switch and boot as 
> the secondary OS. I think the openflow is already successfully installed on 
> the HP switch since I can use openflow CLI to configure. The thing is , I can 
> not make my openflow swtich talk to the controller. 
> 
> I configure the 192.168.1.66 as the ip of HP OFS and 192.168.1.60 for the POX 
> controller as a virtual machine (the physical server is connected to HP OFS) 
> They can ping each other which means the connection is good. 
> 
> But when I configure the OFS by following the manual for K15.10 version. I 
> can not make OFS and POX connected. I configure the instance as aggregate 
> mode but I dont know how can I specific the vlan for controller and vlan for 
> management. The POX is connecting to HP OFS through port 12 which belongs to 
> VLAN1 (the default VLAN).  Also, in the manual, there is one command line 
> which can not be executed, which is "openflow instance aggregate member vlan 
> vlan-id"  There is not member key words. 
> 
> Can anyone help ? I have been struggling on this for 3 days.
> 
> Thanks very much.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> 
> Terry
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openflow-discuss mailing list
> openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> 
> Terry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> 
> Terry 

_______________________________________________
openflow-discuss mailing list
openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss

Reply via email to