Anil is reviewing that patch - but since he is at OpenStack he may not have had a chance. Since he is working in this area - it will be good for him to review it rather than Jozef, Kamal or me. However if he does not get a chance by Monday after he is back - please let me know and I will review/merge it.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Yang, Yi Y <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Brady, I have tested this sfc patch before I submitted it, the > patch for openflowplugin can work well, so it will be great if Abhijit can > help merge openflowplugin as soon as possible. > > > > *From:* Brady Allen Johnson [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 27, 2016 8:31 PM > *To:* Yang, Yi Y <[email protected]>; Sam Hague <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected]; opendaylight sfc < > [email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [SFC] [sfc-dev] ovs nsh patches are available for public > use > > > > Yi, > > I installed your OVS NSH patch, and also built ODL with your > OpenFlowPlugin and SFC patches and am able to get the below NSH flows that > look good to me. > > Once we get the patches merged in ODL, we can start working on using this > in the OPNFV SFC Colorado release. > > Nice work :) > > Regards, > > Brady > > OFPST_FLOW reply (OF1.3) (xid=0x2): > cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=5 > actions=goto_table:1 > cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, > priority=250,nsp=19 actions=goto_table:4 > cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, > priority=250,nsp=8388627 actions=goto_table:4 > cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=5 > actions=drop > cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=2, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=5 > actions=goto_table:3 > cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=3, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=5 > actions=goto_table:4 > cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=4, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, > priority=550,nsi=255,nsp=19 > actions=load:0xbfa8386e->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],goto_table:10 > cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=4, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, > priority=550,nsi=255,nsp=8388627 > actions=load:0xbfa8386e->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],goto_table:10 > cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=4, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=5 > actions=goto_table:10 > cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.976s, table=10, n_packets=0, > n_bytes=0, priority=660,nsi=254,nsp=19,nshc1=0 > actions=load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT > cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.976s, table=10, n_packets=0, > n_bytes=0, priority=660,nsi=254,nsp=8388627,nshc1=0 > actions=load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT > cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.976s, table=10, n_packets=0, > n_bytes=0, priority=650,nsi=254,nsp=19 > actions=move:NXM_NX_NSI[]->NXM_NX_NSI[],move:NXM_NX_NSP[0..23]->NXM_NX_NSP[0..23],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT > cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.001s, table=10, n_packets=0, > n_bytes=0, priority=650,nsi=255,nsp=19 > actions=move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C1[],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C2[],move:NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT > cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.001s, table=10, n_packets=0, > n_bytes=0, priority=650,nsi=254,nsp=8388627 > actions=move:NXM_NX_NSI[]->NXM_NX_NSI[],move:NXM_NX_NSP[0..23]->NXM_NX_NSP[0..23],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT > cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.001s, table=10, n_packets=0, > n_bytes=0, priority=650,nsi=255,nsp=8388627 > actions=move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C1[],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C2[],move:NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT > cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=10, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, > priority=5 actions=drop > > > =========================== > == Easier to read output == > =========================== > > table=0, priority=5 actions=goto_table:1 > > table=1, priority=250,nsp=19 actions=goto_table:4 > table=1, priority=250,nsp=8388627 actions=goto_table:4 > table=1, priority=5 actions=drop > > table=2, priority=5 actions=goto_table:3 > table=3, priority=5 actions=goto_table:4 > > table=4, priority=5 actions=goto_table:10 > table=4, priority=550,nsi=255,nsp=19 > actions=load:0xbfa8386e->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],goto_table:10 > table=4, priority=550,nsi=255,nsp=8388627 > actions=load:0xbfa8386e->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],goto_table:10 > > > table=10, priority=5 actions=drop > table=10, priority=660,nsi=254,nsp=19,nshc1=0 > actions=load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT > table=10, priority=650,nsi=255,nsp=19 > actions=move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C1[], > move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C2[], > move:NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31], > load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[], > IN_PORT > table=10, priority=650,nsi=254,nsp=19 > actions=move:NXM_NX_NSI[]->NXM_NX_NSI[], > move:NXM_NX_NSP[0..23]->NXM_NX_NSP[0..23], > move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[], > move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31], > load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[], > IN_PORT > > table=10, priority=660,nsi=254,nsp=8388627,nshc1=0 > actions=load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT > table=10, priority=650,nsi=255,nsp=8388627 > actions=move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C1[], > move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C2[], > move:NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31], > load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[], > IN_PORT > table=10, priority=650,nsi=254,nsp=8388627 > actions=move:NXM_NX_NSI[]->NXM_NX_NSI[], > move:NXM_NX_NSP[0..23]->NXM_NX_NSP[0..23], > move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[], > move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31], > load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[], > IN_PORT > > > > > On 18/04/16 03:20, Yang, Yi Y wrote: > > Hi, Sam > > > > Replies inline, please check. > > > > *From:* Sam Hague [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] > *Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2016 7:41 PM > *To:* Brady Allen Johnson <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Yang, Yi Y <[email protected]> <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; opendaylight sfc > <[email protected]> <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; > [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [sfc-dev] ovs nsh patches are > available for public use > > > > - what minimum linux kernel is required? OVS version? > > This depends on ovs itself, current ovs git master > > > > - I thought there were changes needed to the kernel, but these look to be > all ovs patches > > ovs includes kernel modules, but to upstream them, kernel modules must be > accepted by Linux firstly, our team is working on this, but progress is > very slow. > > > > - do we need the related kernel gpe patch? > > Jiri has pushed gpe patch, but that only support L3 mode, but current ovs > requires it in L2 mode, they didn’t make an agreement on this work, > progress will be slow. > > > > - what versions of linux distributions have been used? > > It is distribution agnostic, just build it as before. > > > > - eth_nsh is not in the odl ovsdb - is a patch needed there also? > > - does openflowplugin require support? > > Yes, https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/30481 is for your reference, > will update it to adapt to these patches. > > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Brady Allen Johnson < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Yang, > > Thanks for this! > > We'll start looking into using this now. > > Do you know what's the latest status of getting NSH into OVS officially? > What's the difference between this patch in your github and what will be > available officially? > > What are the system requirements for using your patch, like Linux kernel, > OVS, etc. It doesnt look like it, but is DPDK needed with this patch? > > Thanks, > > Brady > > > On 15/04/16 10:53, Yang, Yi Y wrote: > > Hi, folks > > > > We have pushed ovs nsh patches in > https://github.com/yyang13/ovs_nsh_patches, you can follow instructions > in README.md to apply these patches and build ovs to support nsh, please > let me know if you have any problem during using. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sfc-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > > > > >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
