Thomas, good job, thanks, it will be much better if .deb build is also 
provided, many people/demo setup are using Ubuntu-based VMs.

From: Thomas F Herbert [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:18 AM
To: Brady Allen Johnson <[email protected]>; Yang, Yi Y 
<[email protected]>; Sam Hague <[email protected]>
Cc: opendaylight sfc <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] [sfc-dev] ovs nsh patches are available 
for public use


On 4/27/16 8:31 AM, Brady Allen Johnson wrote:
Yi,

I installed your OVS NSH patch, and also built ODL with your OpenFlowPlugin and 
SFC patches and am able to get the below NSH flows that look good to me.

Once we get the patches merged in ODL, we can start working on using this in 
the OPNFV SFC Colorado release.
I don't think we can merge these patches yet into ovs-nfv project yet because 
they are not upstream. However, I have created temporarily a fork of ovs-nfv 
repo that builds these patches into an RPM if you want to try it. This RPM 
should support both Linux kernel data-plane and DPDK.
https://github.com/tfherbert/buildovsnsh

--TFH


Nice work :)

Regards,

Brady
OFPST_FLOW reply (OF1.3) (xid=0x2):
 cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=5 
actions=goto_table:1
 cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
priority=250,nsp=19 actions=goto_table:4
 cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
priority=250,nsp=8388627 actions=goto_table:4
 cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=5 
actions=drop
 cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=2, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=5 
actions=goto_table:3
 cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=3, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=5 
actions=goto_table:4
 cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=4, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
priority=550,nsi=255,nsp=19 
actions=load:0xbfa8386e->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],goto_table:10
 cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=4, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
priority=550,nsi=255,nsp=8388627 
actions=load:0xbfa8386e->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],goto_table:10
 cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=4, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=5 
actions=goto_table:10
 cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.976s, table=10, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
priority=660,nsi=254,nsp=19,nshc1=0 
actions=load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT
 cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.976s, table=10, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
priority=660,nsi=254,nsp=8388627,nshc1=0 
actions=load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT
 cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.976s, table=10, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
priority=650,nsi=254,nsp=19 
actions=move:NXM_NX_NSI[]->NXM_NX_NSI[],move:NXM_NX_NSP[0..23]->NXM_NX_NSP[0..23],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT
 cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.001s, table=10, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
priority=650,nsi=255,nsp=19 
actions=move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C1[],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C2[],move:NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT
 cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.001s, table=10, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
priority=650,nsi=254,nsp=8388627 
actions=move:NXM_NX_NSI[]->NXM_NX_NSI[],move:NXM_NX_NSP[0..23]->NXM_NX_NSP[0..23],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT
 cookie=0xba5eba11ba5eba11, duration=0.001s, table=10, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
priority=650,nsi=255,nsp=8388627 
actions=move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C1[],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C2[],move:NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT
 cookie=0x14, duration=0.001s, table=10, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=5 
actions=drop

===========================
== Easier to read output ==
===========================
table=0, priority=5 actions=goto_table:1

table=1, priority=250,nsp=19 actions=goto_table:4
table=1, priority=250,nsp=8388627 actions=goto_table:4
table=1, priority=5 actions=drop

table=2, priority=5 actions=goto_table:3
table=3, priority=5 actions=goto_table:4

table=4, priority=5 actions=goto_table:10
table=4, priority=550,nsi=255,nsp=19 
actions=load:0xbfa8386e->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],goto_table:10
table=4, priority=550,nsi=255,nsp=8388627 
actions=load:0xbfa8386e->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],goto_table:10


table=10, priority=5 actions=drop
table=10, priority=660,nsi=254,nsp=19,nshc1=0
    actions=load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT
table=10, priority=650,nsi=255,nsp=19
    actions=move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C1[],
            move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C2[],
            move:NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],
            load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],
            IN_PORT
table=10, priority=650,nsi=254,nsp=19
    actions=move:NXM_NX_NSI[]->NXM_NX_NSI[],
            move:NXM_NX_NSP[0..23]->NXM_NX_NSP[0..23],
            move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],
            move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],
            load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],
            IN_PORT

table=10, priority=660,nsi=254,nsp=8388627,nshc1=0
    actions=load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],IN_PORT
table=10, priority=650,nsi=255,nsp=8388627
    actions=move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C1[],
            move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_NSH_C2[],
            move:NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],
            load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],
            IN_PORT
table=10, priority=650,nsi=254,nsp=8388627
    actions=move:NXM_NX_NSI[]->NXM_NX_NSI[],
            move:NXM_NX_NSP[0..23]->NXM_NX_NSP[0..23],
            move:NXM_NX_NSH_C1[]->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],
            move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],
            load:0x4->NXM_NX_TUN_GPE_NP[],
            IN_PORT



On 18/04/16 03:20, Yang, Yi Y wrote:
Hi, Sam

Replies inline, please check.

From: Sam Hague [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 7:41 PM
To: Brady Allen Johnson 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: Yang, Yi Y <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
opendaylight sfc 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [sfc-dev] ovs nsh patches are available for 
public use

- what minimum linux kernel is required? OVS version?
This depends on ovs itself, current ovs git master

- I thought there were changes needed to the kernel, but these look to be all 
ovs patches
ovs includes kernel modules, but to upstream them, kernel modules must be 
accepted by Linux firstly, our team is working on this, but progress is very 
slow.

- do we need the related kernel gpe patch?
Jiri has pushed gpe patch, but that only support L3 mode, but current ovs 
requires it in L2 mode, they didn’t make an agreement on this work, progress 
will be slow.

- what versions of linux distributions have been used?
It is distribution agnostic, just build it as before.

- eth_nsh is not in the odl ovsdb - is a patch needed there also?
- does openflowplugin require support?
Yes, https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/30481 is for your reference, will 
update it to adapt to these patches.

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Brady Allen Johnson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
Yang,

Thanks for this!

We'll start looking into using this now.

Do you know what's the latest status of getting NSH into OVS officially? What's 
the difference between this patch in your github and what will be available 
officially?

What are the system requirements for using your patch, like Linux kernel, OVS, 
etc. It doesnt look like it, but is DPDK needed with this patch?

Thanks,

Brady


On 15/04/16 10:53, Yang, Yi Y wrote:
Hi, folks

We have pushed ovs nsh patches in https://github.com/yyang13/ovs_nsh_patches, 
you can follow instructions in README.md to apply these patches and build ovs 
to support nsh, please let me know if you have any problem during using.



_______________________________________________

sfc-dev mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev


_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss






_______________________________________________

opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

--
Thomas F Herbert
SDN Group
Office of Technology
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to