Shuva, is the root cause of https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 the same as https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6595 ? If so I can bring the test we had before using old OVS/mininet as it was failing very consistently.
BR/Luis > On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:38 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Alon, > > As discussed with Koby over IRC today, with statistics turned off we mightnot > see this issue. As I understand netvirt doesnot(as of now depend much on > OfPlugin statistics) hence with stats off if the issue is not reproduced, I > think we can consider that to be a valid workaround for SR2. > > Since the primary way of reproducing the issue involves bringing interfaces > up/down iteratively the rca might take some involvement from both the teams – > netvirt and ofplugin. > > Thanks, > -shuva > > From: Kochba, Alon [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 5:36 PM > To: Abhijit Kumbhare; An Ho > Cc: openflowplugin-dev; Anil Vishnoi; Luis Gomez; Colin Dixon; > [email protected]; Jozef Bacigal; Shuva Jyoti Kar; Sam Hague > Subject: RE: openflowplugin blocker bug > > Hi Abhijit, > > I commented on the bug [1]. > This bug is very problematic in that it leaves the DPN unusable, though it > appears as available so VMs are allocated to it. > It has been encountered several times and reproduction details/info was > provided, would appreciate your feedback on the bug itself. > > Due to the nature of this bug I think it's important we at least analyze the > root cause and provide a workaround for SR2. > > [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 > > Thanks, > --alon > > From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:04 > To: An Ho <[email protected]>; Kochba, Alon <[email protected]> > Cc: openflowplugin-dev <[email protected]>; Anil > Vishnoi <[email protected]>; Luis Gomez <[email protected]>; Colin Dixon > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Jozef Bacigal > <[email protected]>; Shuva Jyoti Kar <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: openflowplugin blocker bug > > If I am not mistaken - I think Anil had backed out the following change: > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6917. Not sure if it got merged > Anil? > > About https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 - added Alon (as he > has raised the priority to blocker yesterday). > > Alon - would like to check with you if you think it is OK to defer this bug > (6908) to the next SR since we need to get this SR out and the > investigation/fix by Shuva/Jozef may need a few days? > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:20 PM, An Ho <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, > > We would like to kindly request an update on these OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron > Blocker Bugs? Please let us know the ETA for a fix or if we should retarget > the blocker bug for Boron-SR3 instead. > > Bug 6908 - failed to update port status - all new OVS ports fail from this > point. Is this only for Carbon or does it apply to Boron-SR2 as well? > Otherwise, we should retarget for Carbon. > Bug 6917 - Flow matching function (operational flow reconciliation) is not > stable. Luis reopened this bug on 12/08. Are there plans to fix it now, or > can we retarget for Boron-SR3 for more time? > > Best Regards, > An Ho > > [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 > [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7343 > _______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
