So we will continue investigating this in the coming days but the fix will most likely be in the SR3 timeframe. Till then the workaround of turning off stats as mentioned by Shuva might be the option.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alon, > > > > As discussed with Koby over IRC today, with statistics turned off we > mightnot see this issue. As I understand netvirt doesnot(as of now depend > much on OfPlugin statistics) hence with stats off if the issue is not > reproduced, I think we can consider that to be a valid workaround for SR2. > > > > Since the primary way of reproducing the issue involves bringing > interfaces up/down iteratively the rca might take some involvement from > both the teams – netvirt and ofplugin. > > > > Thanks, > > -shuva > > > > *From:* Kochba, Alon [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 13, 2016 5:36 PM > *To:* Abhijit Kumbhare; An Ho > *Cc:* openflowplugin-dev; Anil Vishnoi; Luis Gomez; Colin Dixon; > [email protected]; Jozef Bacigal; Shuva Jyoti Kar; Sam Hague > *Subject:* RE: openflowplugin blocker bug > > > > Hi Abhijit, > > > > I commented on the bug [1]. > > This bug is very problematic in that it leaves the DPN unusable, though it > appears as available so VMs are allocated to it. > > It has been encountered several times and reproduction details/info was > provided, would appreciate your feedback on the bug itself. > > > > Due to the nature of this bug I think it's important we at least analyze > the root cause and provide a workaround for SR2. > > > > [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 > > > > Thanks, > > --alon > > > > *From:* Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] > *Sent:* Tuesday, 13 December 2016 04:04 > *To:* An Ho <[email protected]>; Kochba, Alon <[email protected]> > *Cc:* openflowplugin-dev <[email protected]>; > Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]>; Luis Gomez <[email protected]>; > Colin Dixon <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Jozef > Bacigal <[email protected]>; Shuva Jyoti Kar < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: openflowplugin blocker bug > > > > If I am not mistaken - I think Anil had backed out the following change: > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6917. Not sure if it got > merged Anil? > > > > About https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 - added Alon (as > he has raised the priority to blocker yesterday). > > > > Alon - would like to check with you if you think it is OK to defer this > bug (6908) to the next SR since we need to get this SR out and the > investigation/fix by Shuva/Jozef may need a few days? > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:20 PM, An Ho <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, > > We would like to kindly request an update on these OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron > Blocker Bugs? Please let us know the ETA for a fix or if we should > retarget the blocker bug for Boron-SR3 instead. > > Bug 6908 - failed to update port status - all new OVS ports fail from this > point. Is this only for Carbon or does it apply to Boron-SR2 as well? > Otherwise, we should retarget for Carbon. > Bug 6917 - Flow matching function (operational flow reconciliation) is not > stable. Luis reopened this bug on 12/08. Are there plans to fix it now, > or can we retarget for Boron-SR3 for more time? > > Best Regards, > An Ho > > [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 > [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7343 > > >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
