On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Dave Crossland <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6 June 2013 15:52, Nathan Willis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Kind of wonder why it doesn't.... > > Feature creep is bad, users want less features, options and > preferences by default; that's what extension are for. > Sorry I was going to reply earlier but Firefox Sync and WebRTC kept interrupting me. In all seriousness, support for webfonts itself is feature-creep; at least defensibly so. I would put this squarely in the category of building the right UI for the feature you've already decided to support (@font-face). It wouldn't hurt things to group webfonts with the image, sound, and video elements in the "Media" tab either; my real concern is just that they aren't exposed at all, not that they don't have a tab all of their own. Nate -- nathan.p.willis [email protected] identi.ca/n8
