-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/12/2010 04:58 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > It's the pure bike shed principle. No one wants to discuss the plans for the > nuclear power plant.
I'm quite happy to do so, just let me know where to point my neutrons. :-) > After discussing a bit with Cristy, we also have a plan on how to keep the > legal obligations satisfied without interfering too much in the daily > workflow. Can you please elaborate on this? > However, we're completely in the dark when it comes to release management. If > you go back to the earlier threads here, it's one of the topics where there > was the least discussion. I think part of the reason you didn't get much response is that you were moving through topics very quickly (confusion) and there wasn't a clear seperation/outline of them. That was my personal issue with trying to keep up. I've reopened what I think was the relevant thread, though. > If you want to help, here are a couple of things you can do: > > - ensure that the wiki page is detailed with what we have consensus on, like > Tor Arne's plans I don't know what we have any clear consensus on, but I've tried to keep the wiki fairly well up to date (at least from the initial discussions). I'll take a look back over Tor's thread and see if there's any material to add. > - go back to the list of topics I posted in the first days and see if we have > any sort of conclusion > > - if we don't, reopen the discussion and try to steer it to conclusions OK. I've already reopened the release thread. Are there any other areas you'd like to discuss in more detail? > On topics where there is no conclusion, we'll assume the the bike shed - > power > plant principle and probably simply implement what works best for us. I would encourage you to try ask yourself for clarification from the hivemind if there are areas you don't think are fully clear. Silence might mean people don't know what to answer. Some of the people on this list obviously won't have a lot of time to devote to these discussions, and some might simply not be as able to keep up with the discussion, but they should still be allowed to have some input, even if that requires taking a tiny bit more time to re-explain things. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM3YH5AAoJEL09WxvSn7p9QUcH/RYkimsmWzFznqQcYizJLAvu 9T0bQlHT1P8GwRlDVg5zZIquX06x17RtVh1FX6EcS+0ywOf3Vt4k3Q2H4Djsb/Cm YfCBGn1MtM2+IAEn7XbNm4hUBQyB2Z7MRysny/NcGjLiVkye9aRheM30WK1jFds/ w5ip9nboKSi8G4FwvH7ojsm4BxCVvP92HTZNlB5h5f1hwWLLtZNXFk/oNVXJtIuX +Wv7wzQi3ULh0KpJpltFDEkQ0I1Re+rbdAwPrnI3ngIVPw5V/ktx2vn34gi+AI+O 1NtJgLF9/O09F5UYZ9SMpNxOPXH6K3W5zDDMu9e5XxDsdy0Yyi1jsWht+Kexnis= =LBLv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Opengov mailing list Opengov@qt-labs.org http://lists.qt-labs.org/listinfo/opengov
