... > I really wouldn't like to include more conflict resolution than that, > because I like to think that everyone contributing would be sane, and > mature enough to know that they need to act in Qt's best interests. > Assume good faith. > > If you *really* must include some bureaucracy, then maybe include a > per-module 'facilitator' who can resolve conflict for their module. I > don't think you need it to go further, myself.
Personally I think there really should be a process for resolving conflicts for a module, and also at a higher level for decisions like whether a module should be added or removed. Hopefully such processes act as a deterrent, reducing the number of conflicts that occur in practice. Kind regards, Don Sanders _______________________________________________ Opengov mailing list Opengov@qt-labs.org http://lists.qt-labs.org/listinfo/opengov
