(Judging from the fact that I received this message, I am apparently not cut
off completely from the list, only from posting to it.)
Thomas Beale wrote:
>Jim Self wrote:
>>Would I somehow be missing the boat by starting with SmallEiffel?
>
>Well, only in that there is no graphical IDE (I don't believe - I haven't
used
>it yet). But perhaps you should try the ISE (www.eiffel.com) compiler - you
can
>use it for a month for free.
>
>By the way, I don't have a problem with some of the things being said about
>MUMPS here - I have actually seen a good MUMPS system in use;
Thank you. I appreciate that.
>I just think that
>we need to capture the design, specifications, models etc of such systems,
>but move on as far as implementation is concerned.
I agree. I will be happy to move on when a platform is proven to me to be
superior and the capture of design etc. is accomplished. That is why I am
paying attention to your writing, and that of Gunther, and David, etc.
>- thomas beale
>
>--
>---------------------------------------------
>Deep Thought Informatics Pty Ltd
>Information and Knowledge Systems Engineering
>
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.gehr.org
>phone: +61 7 5439 9405
>
>http://www.elj.com/eiffel/ebs
>---------------------------------------------
>
>
---------------------------------------
Jim Self
Manager and Chief Developer
VMTH Computer Services, UC Davis
(http://www.vmth.ucdavis.edu/us/jaself)
